|
|
|
|
Gather Conditioning for Inversion
The graph at right compares VP to VS sonic data for a huge number of worldwide
rock samples. WIT's Dr. Joe Higginbotham realized that a hyperbola fit
the data better than the straight line (Castagna's "mudrock line"). WIT's
hyperbolic mudrock line (patent application filed) is described by only
one parameter, which is a
function of AVA slope over intercept. Thus, we can obtain a VS trend
directly from the seismic amplitudes. We condition gathers (PSTM or
PSDM gathers) as follows: 1) compute a VS curve from the unconditioned
slope/intercept volumes; 2) Compute a survey-wide slope scaling
parameter that brings the computed VS curve in line with empirical data; 3)
calibrate the gathers accordingly. In addition to delivering conditioned
gathers, we deliver background VS and density volumes for inversion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Azimuthal Anisotropy ("Fracture") Analysis
Here we show a typical fracture map produced by WIT Angle.
The "hot" colors like yellow and pink illustrate fractured
zones, while the green arrows indicate implied fracture
orientation. Faults and well spots are shown. The fracture
orientation agreed with FMI information in one well.
Experience tells us that we can detect variations in azimuthal anisotropy of 0.5% or greater with wide azimuth P-wave data. In most cases, the magnitude azimuthal anisotropy varies from 0 to 1.5%, but we have seen isolated zones with 3%. WIT Angle attributes (AVA and fractures) are offered at a reasonable incremental price beyond a typical WIT Depth project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |||||||||||||
|
|
© 2012, Wave Imaging Technology, Inc. | All rights reserved | +1.281.556.5980 | Contact
|
|
|